2002 BMW M3 vs. 1983 ZIL 4104
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,689 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1983 ZIL 4104. (311 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1983 ZIL 4104. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 ZIL 4104 weights approximately 1740 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 ZIL 4104 (608 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 1983 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1983 ZIL 4104 | |
Make | BMW | ZIL |
Model | M3 | 4104 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 7689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 608 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 3335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3340 mm |