2002 BMW M3 vs. 1991 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1991 Ford Taurus. (89 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Taurus weights approximately 300 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Taurus. (176 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1991 Ford Taurus | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Taurus |
Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 2512 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1400 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |