2002 BMW M3 vs. 1993 Mazda 626
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 330 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626.
Because 1993 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (170 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1993 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | M3 | 626 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2630 mm |
