2002 BMW M3 vs. 1995 Volvo 850
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 320 more horse power than 1995 Volvo 850. (124 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Volvo 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Volvo 850 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Volvo 850. (170 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Volvo 850.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1995 Volvo 850 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M3 | 850 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1335 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2670 mm |