2002 BMW M3 vs. 1997 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 348 more horse power than 1997 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1997 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 136 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1997 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | M3 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 139 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1236 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2210 mm |