2002 BMW M3 vs. 1997 Vector M12
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Vector M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Vector M12 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Vector M12 (484 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2002 BMW M3. (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Vector M12 weights approximately 530 kg more than 2002 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Vector M12 (576 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW M3. (480 Nm). This means 1997 Vector M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1997 Vector M12 | |
Make | BMW | Vector |
Model | M3 | M12 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 5707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 484 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 576 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2750 mm |