2002 BMW M3 vs. 1998 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP) has 316 more horse power than 1998 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1998 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Honda CR-V weights approximately 400 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 1998 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1998 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | M3 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 480 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1500 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2620 mm |