2002 BMW M3 vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
Make | BMW | Panoz |
Model | M3 | Q9 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 355 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 59 L |