2002 BMW M3 vs. 1999 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1999 Ford Falcon. (220 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Falcon weights approximately 430 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Falcon. (366 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1999 Ford Falcon | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 3982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2880 mm |