2002 BMW M3 vs. 1999 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Honda HR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Honda HR-V would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 331 more horse power than 1999 Honda HR-V. (113 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Honda HR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Honda HR-V weights approximately 20 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda HR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Honda HR-V. (130 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1999 Honda HR-V | |
| Make | BMW | Honda |
| Model | M3 | HR-V |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1672 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1120 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2360 mm |
