2002 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 2000 Honda CR-V. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda CR-V weights approximately 400 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2000 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2000 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | M3 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1500 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2620 mm |