2002 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Lotus GT 1
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus GT 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus GT 1 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus GT 1 (573 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2002 BMW M3. (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus GT 1 should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2000 Lotus GT 1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus GT 1. (391 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus GT 1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 2000 Lotus GT 1 | |
| Make | BMW | Lotus |
| Model | M3 | GT 1 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 3506 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 573 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 391 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1050 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2690 mm |
