2002 BMW M3 vs. 2001 MG ZT
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG ZT would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 2001 MG ZT. (187 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2001 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 MG ZT weights approximately 475 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 MG ZT. (245 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2001 MG ZT | |
Make | BMW | MG |
Model | M3 | ZT |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2760 mm |