2002 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Caterham 7
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 2003 Caterham 7. (160 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Caterham 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 600 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2003 Caterham 7 | |
Make | BMW | Caterham |
Model | M3 | 7 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 500 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2230 mm |