2002 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2003 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 2003 Mazda RX-8. (228 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 325 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 2003 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | M3 | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 211 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1425 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2710 mm |
