2002 BMW M3 vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP) has 374 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 360 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | BMW | MCC |
| Model | M3 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 740 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 1810 mm |
