2002 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 5,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac Escalade. (345 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac Escalade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1567 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW M3. (480 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2004 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | M3 | Escalade |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 5996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2667 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3310 mm |