2002 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Fiat Palio
To start off, 2004 Fiat Palio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 391 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Palio. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Palio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 195 kg more than 2004 Fiat Palio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Palio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Palio. (84 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2004 Fiat Palio | |
Make | BMW | Fiat |
Model | M3 | Palio |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 84 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2380 mm |