2002 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Kia Optima
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 2004 Kia Optima. (137 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 388 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Optima. (199 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2004 Kia Optima | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | M3 | Optima |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 199 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1488 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2710 mm |