2002 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B4000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B4000. (208 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B4000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B4000 weights approximately 567 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2004 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B4000. (310 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 2004 Mazda B4000 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | M3 | B4000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 4031 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1667 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3200 mm |
