2002 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP) has 234 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 975 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. (344 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2004 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | BMW | Mercury |
Model | M3 | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 4013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 480 Nm | 344 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2075 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2900 mm |