2002 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 361 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 430 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | M3 | K2700 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |