2002 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | M3 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 4016 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 206 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 324 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3010 mm |
