2002 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2006 Land Rover LR3. (300 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Land Rover LR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 1361 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Land Rover LR3. (427 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Land Rover LR3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2006 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | BMW | Land Rover |
Model | M3 | LR3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2461 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2890 mm |