2002 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 321 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (174 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | M3 | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2960 mm |
