2002 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire. (215 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 385 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire. (311 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2009 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | M3 | Crossfire |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 311 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1485 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |