2002 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2010 Ford Maverick is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 322 more horse power than 2010 Ford Maverick. (122 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Maverick weights approximately 415 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2010 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Maverick. (175 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2010 Ford Maverick | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Maverick |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1515 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2630 mm |