2002 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2010 Holden UTE. (357 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW M3. (480 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | M3 | UTE |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
