2002 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Lancia Musa
To start off, 2010 Lancia Musa is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 344 more horse power than 2010 Lancia Musa. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Lancia Musa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lancia Musa weights approximately 250 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lancia Musa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lancia Musa. (260 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lancia Musa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 2010 Lancia Musa | |
| Make | BMW | Lancia |
| Model | M3 | Musa |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1350 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2520 mm |
