2002 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Chrysler Delta
To start off, 2011 Chrysler Delta is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 324 more horse power than 2011 Chrysler Delta. (120 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Chrysler Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chrysler Delta weights approximately 295 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler Delta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chrysler Delta. (206 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chrysler Delta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 2011 Chrysler Delta | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | M3 | Delta |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1368 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1395 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2710 mm |
