2002 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 945 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
Make | BMW | Fisker |
Model | M3 | Karma |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 2540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 36 L |