2002 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP) has 377 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2490 mm |