2002 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP) has 343 more horse power than 2011 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 351 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M3 | C30 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1451 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2639 mm |