2002 BMW M3 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (503 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2002 BMW M3. (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 775 kg more than 2002 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (625 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW M3. (480 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | M3 | XF |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 503 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 625 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1875 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2909 mm |
