2002 BMW Z4 vs. 1958 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2002 BMW Z4 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado (204 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2002 BMW Z4. (193 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW Z4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 825 kg more than 2002 BMW Z4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW Z4 | 1958 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z4 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1958 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 2190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3300 mm |
