2002 BMW Z4 vs. 1999 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2002 BMW Z4 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2002 BMW Z4. (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW Z4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Z4 weights approximately 33 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW Z4 | 1999 Dodge Charger | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | Z4 | Charger |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 4760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |