2002 BMW Z4 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2002 BMW Z4 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2002 BMW Z4. (193 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW Z4.
Because 2002 BMW Z4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW Z4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW Z4. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW Z4.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW Z4 | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | Z4 | SS |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |