2002 BMW Z4 vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Z4 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z4 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 939 kg more than 2002 BMW Z4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW Z4. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW Z4.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW Z4 | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Z4 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3510 mm |