2002 BMW Z4 vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2004 GMC Savana is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Z4 would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Savana (285 HP) has 58 more horse power than 2002 BMW Z4. (227 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW Z4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 1151 kg more than 2002 BMW Z4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (441 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW Z4. (300 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW Z4.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW Z4 | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | Z4 | Savana |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 5359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 285 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 2537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.5 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 117 L |