2002 BMW Z4 vs. 2005 Saab 9-2x
To start off, 2005 Saab 9-2x is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Z4 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z4 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9-2x. (173 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9-2x. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9-2x weights approximately 7 kg more than 2002 BMW Z4.
Because 2005 Saab 9-2x is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW Z4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9-2x will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z4 (300 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9-2x. (225 Nm). This means 2002 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9-2x.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW Z4 | 2005 Saab 9-2x | |
Make | BMW | Saab |
Model | Z4 | 9-2x |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 225 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1393 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.3 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.5 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |