2002 BMW Z4 vs. 2009 BMW 328
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Z4 would be higher. Both 2002 BMW Z4 and 2009 BMW 328 are equipped with a 2,996 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2002 BMW Z4. (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW Z4.
Because 2009 BMW 328 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW Z4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z4 (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 328. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2002 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 328. 2002 BMW Z4 has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW 328 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW 328 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 BMW Z4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW Z4 | 2009 BMW 328 | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | Z4 | 328 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.3 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.5 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |