2002 BMW Z4 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Z4 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2002 BMW Z4. (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW Z4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 369 kg more than 2002 BMW Z4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW Z4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW Z4. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW Z4.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW Z4 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | Z4 | XJ |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 244 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.2 seconds | 6.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1755 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5127 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3032 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.3 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.5 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |