2002 BMW Z4 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Z4 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2002 BMW Z4. (193 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW Z4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 562 kg more than 2002 BMW Z4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW Z4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW Z4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW Z4. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW Z4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW Z4 | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | Z4 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1927 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5108 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1728 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.3 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.5 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 76 L |
