2002 BMW Z4 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Z4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 92 kg more than 2002 BMW Z4.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW Z4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z4 (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW Z4 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | BMW | Mini |
Model | Z4 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.3 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.5 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 47 L |