2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (351 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 456 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Bristol Blenheim | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Bristol | Triumph |
| Model | Blenheim | Renown |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 351 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2750 mm |
