2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1954 Buick 40
To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (351 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (193 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 20 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bristol Blenheim | 1954 Buick 40 | |
Make | Bristol | Buick |
Model | Blenheim | 40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 410 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1720 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3110 mm |