2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1963 Volvo 120

To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (351 HP) has 284 more horse power than 1963 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1963 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 730 kg more than 1963 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2002 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Volvo 120.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Bristol Blenheim 1963 Volvo 120
Make Bristol Volvo
Model Blenheim 120
Year Released 2002 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5898 cc 1778 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 351 HP 67 HP
Torque 500 Nm 144 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1740 kg 1010 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2610 mm