2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1964 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mini Countryman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mini Countryman would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 735 kg more than 1964 Mini Countryman.
Because 2002 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 1964 Mini Countryman has manual transmission. 1964 Mini Countryman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bristol Blenheim | 1964 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Bristol | Mini |
Model | Blenheim | Countryman |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2140 mm |