2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1971 Fiat ESV
To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Fiat ESV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Fiat ESV would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (351 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 313 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Because 2002 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Fiat ESV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat ESV. (134 Nm). This means 2002 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Bristol Blenheim | 1971 Fiat ESV | |
| Make | Bristol | Fiat |
| Model | Blenheim | ESV |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 351 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 134 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
