2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1973 Holden UTE
To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (351 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1973 Holden UTE. (240 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1973 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Holden UTE. (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bristol Blenheim | 1973 Holden UTE | |
Make | Bristol | Holden |
Model | Blenheim | UTE |
Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5047 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |